Bug Tracker for SDK?
응답
17. 2. 13 오후 1:24

Hi XDK-Team,

do you happen to have a Bug-Tracker (maybe even reachable from within Bosch corporate network), where I contribute some issues in order to give you something back in turn for providing us with such an awesome tool chain?

Example for XDK workbench v1.7.0 : In file XDK-Workbench\SDK\xdk110\Platform\Wlan\include\BCDS_NetworkConfig.h, the documentation is (I suppose) outdated (line 144ff):

 *                myIpSet.isDHCP        =  (uint8_t)  DHCP_DISABLED;
 *                myIpSet.ipV4          =  NCI_ipv4Value(192,168,2,120);
 *                myIpSet.ipV4DnsServer =  NCI_ipv4Value(192,168,2,1);
 *                myIpSet.ipV4Gateway   =  NCI_ipv4Value(192,168,2,1);
 *                myIpSet.ipV4Mask      =  NCI_ipv4Value(255,255,255,0);

The referred macro/function does no longer exist in the SDK and should be named

* NETWORKCONFIG_DHCP_DISABLED instead of DHCP-DISABLED

* NetworkConfig_Ipv4Value() instead of NCI_ipv4Value()

I stubled across some more, and I would take my time in order to revisit my code for these differences, if you had a bug tracker.

Best,

Stephan

0 (0 투표)
RE: Bug Tracker for SDK?
응답
17. 2. 13 오후 6:10 as a reply to Stephan Ludwig.

Hello Stephan,

we use an internal tool to track all current bugs of the XDK. Unfortunately is these information limited to members of the XDK support team. But you can open threads in improvement wishlist to hint bugs, outdated documentation like the Wi-Fi documentation or things which should be improved.

Thank you for this hint of the outdated Wi-Fi documentation and please do not hesitate to ask if you have further questions.

Kind regards,
Franjo

+1 (1 투표)
RE: Bug Tracker for SDK?
응답
17. 2. 14 오후 12:02 as a reply to Franjo Stjepandic.
Great, Franjo , thanks for your reply. I will do as suggested. /Stephan
0 (0 투표)
RE: Bug Tracker for SDK?
응답
17. 2. 14 오후 3:51 as a reply to Stephan Ludwig.

Hello Stephan,

Great! Please let me know if you have any further questions.

Kind regards,
Franjo

0 (0 투표)
RE: Bug Tracker for SDK?
응답
17. 2. 15 오전 7:19 as a reply to Franjo Stjepandic.

Hey Franjo,

great trick! Thanks a lot. That worked. I wished, I saw that in the documentation. Have you thought about adding that? Maybe with a recommendation, which of the three possibilities to implement sockets (simplelink/socket.h; ServalStack/api/ServalXTcp.h, ServalStack/pal/Serval_Tcp.h) is recommendes by BCDS. I guess you recommend XTcp, because it is the one with the highest hardware abstraction.

 

Best,

Stephan

0 (0 투표)
RE: Bug Tracker for SDK?
응답
17. 2. 15 오후 5:16 as a reply to Stephan Ludwig.

Hello Stephan,

great to hear that it worked! For any other community users reading this thread, stephan is referring to the thread about XTcp.
The XTcp implementation in the serval stack is indeed the highest abstraction layer and fairly simple to implement. Adding more description about XTcp might be useful. I will discuss this topic with the development team. As you have mentioned the documentation of the simplelink API is slightly more detailed and also available at Texas Instruments.
Nevertheless, as you have mentioned we always recommend to use the highest abstraction layer if the lower layer doest not involve significant benefits.

Please do not hesitate to ask if you have further questions.

Kind regards,
Franjo

0 (0 투표)